Return-Path: Message-ID: <1386680927.11483.6.camel@pc.interlinx.bc.ca> Subject: mouse not found with bluez5 but was fine with bluez4 From: "Brian J. Murrell" To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 08:08:47 -0500 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dnxGCEnr1pAo7Mk5JNKn" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-dnxGCEnr1pAo7Mk5JNKn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, in chasing an issue with mouse pairing in another thread I was asked to upgrade to Fedora 20 to see if my mouse pairing issue was reproducible on bluez5 given that bluez4 is pretty dead now. But the same mouse that could be found and paired on bluez4 (Fedora 19) is not even being found during the search on bluez5 (Fedora 20) on the exact same hardware (same machine in fact). Bluez5 did manage to see and pair a headset though, just not this mouse. What information/tests can I provide to help figure this out? Cheers, b. --=-dnxGCEnr1pAo7Mk5JNKn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJSpxJgAAoJENrB0DQWy8igQSwH/37PQEPQ7SSovdl96fLBMFD4 vg+FmYAScffe0EQuf/I3hLpTZl2EhA7KRv/lzO4eixFFq66yzrBmU1hFUpMS1kbf XFbpPYNUh2vG/LpOnFDl0dVyu1Vk6PffxVjaDSrcoZTtdfMFN6LpakVZdPtv7cbS EDc3eOxI6i8wxVK40qzoopNU55OdgCNHQsOikQV6ZmRrDGiaeAssBpQVmP3uxS4a e8UhwaitGHQ67Ejny+M4SBXQdsMQ4KukBV4uCSSf2c6mY2Lie6qaO5MIdewcQfPW NQUNIhGu4fqVkap4PVIBkiBatDua6YD2t2uLQSahXCNKaLQ08ckgHDPSUfBuPJU= =VW7A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dnxGCEnr1pAo7Mk5JNKn--