Return-Path: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ v2 01/18] doc: Add GATT API From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <20140121194842.GA3342@x220.p-661hnu-f1> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:51:48 -0800 Cc: Claudio Takahasi , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org development" Message-Id: References: <1390310814-19880-1-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org> <1390310814-19880-2-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org> <20140121194842.GA3342@x220.p-661hnu-f1> To: Johan Hedberg Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johan, >>>> +Interface org.bluez.GattServiceManager1 [Experimental] >>>> +Object path /org/bluez >>> >>> Here we could discuss to use GattManager1 to make it shorter, but I >>> am not sure if that actually helps. I currently tend to leave it as >>> GattServiceManager1. >> >> I prefer GattManager1. I have two reasons: >> * "Service" is included in the methods names: RegisterService and >> UnregisterService >> * GattManager1 name is more generic and we can use it for other GATT >> methods not directly related to "Service". At the moment, I don't have >> examples, but I was thinking on potential methods related to GATT >> Client. >> >> Marcel/Johan: Please define which name will be used. > > I'm voting for GattManager1, but Marcel has veto rights :) lets go with GattManager1 and see where it takes us. Regards Marcel