Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:48:42 +0200
From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To: Claudio Takahasi <claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
	"linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org development" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ v2 01/18] doc: Add GATT API
Message-ID: <20140121194842.GA3342@x220.p-661hnu-f1>
References: <1390310814-19880-1-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org>
 <1390310814-19880-2-git-send-email-claudio.takahasi@openbossa.org>
 <B5AE7C1F-664D-4859-9793-E853DFF02FC5@holtmann.org>
 <CAKT1EBc-VL5M0c1yt8LpGvaTyyE7P=9w5jGOZs7wUpRpsS7A8Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <CAKT1EBc-VL5M0c1yt8LpGvaTyyE7P=9w5jGOZs7wUpRpsS7A8Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Claudio,

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014, Claudio Takahasi wrote:
> >> +Interface    org.bluez.GattServiceManager1 [Experimental]
> >> +Object path  /org/bluez
> >
> > Here we could discuss to use GattManager1 to make it shorter, but I
> > am not sure if that actually helps. I currently tend to leave it as
> > GattServiceManager1.
> 
> I prefer GattManager1. I have two reasons:
> * "Service" is included in the methods names: RegisterService and
> UnregisterService
> * GattManager1 name is more generic and we can use it for other GATT
> methods not directly related to "Service". At the moment, I don't have
> examples, but I was thinking on potential methods related to GATT
> Client.
> 
> Marcel/Johan: Please define which name will be used.

I'm voting for GattManager1, but Marcel has veto rights :)

Johan