Return-Path: Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:22:23 +0000 From: One Thousand Gnomes To: Feng Tang Cc: Peter Hurley , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Beat Bolli , Pavel Roskin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jiri Kosina , David Sterba , Felipe Balbi , Grant Edwards , Stanislaw Gruszka , Hal Murray , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth , feng.tang@intel.com, bin.yang@intel.com, alek.du@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix low_latency BUG Message-ID: <20140227092223.5b035f7f@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <1393072281-5814-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <530E0AD3.7040909@hurleysoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > I'm glad to hear that the Bluetooth uart interface is getting > > some use; that means someone will soon be fixing the hard lockup > > in hci_uart_tx_wakeup() reported here: > > I'm not very familiar with the BT devices on our platforms, but most > of them are not using the in-kernel BT driver, some just use the > n_tty ldisc and the raw data, some use their own ldisc driver. Outside of the world of phones/android the Bluetooth on quite a few of the Baytrail/T devices is on the LPSS serial so it probably will be getting tested sooner not later and there will actually be a common platform around that is using the bluetooth uart features. I'm not anticipating any problems though. Alan