Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linus971@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <164289036.20140315145146@eikelenboom.it> References: <1391997564-1805-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <3E0F3723-029F-4B12-8D77-9790FDBD3227@holtmann.org> <1259174563.20140212120644@eikelenboom.it> <1335661753.20140303203853@eikelenboom.it> <1295963563.20140310093843@eikelenboom.it> <20140310150858.GA25703@tuxdriver.com> <1679354302.20140314014901@eikelenboom.it> <53225B87.1030904@hurleysoftware.com> <164289036.20140315145146@eikelenboom.it> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 10:53:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RC6 Bell Chime] [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes From: Linus Torvalds To: Sander Eikelenboom Cc: Peter Hurley , "John W. Linville" , "David S. Miller" , Marcel Holtmann , "Gustavo F. Padovan" , "bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org)" , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-ID: On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > > > Ok but the breakage/regression was known since around the merge window. > I thought the "standard policy" when things cause new regression and are not fixable (too intrusive, too time consuming you > name the reason), was to revert .. It is indeed. Guys, why is this being discussed? We should not release a known-broken 3.14 just because the fix is too big for rc. Things should be reverted. Linus