Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <6E6C1573-4744-486B-B2E6-2D3DC45D024B@warski.org> <407CD6A9-AFA8-4A8A-BA2C-882D7A64EF40@warski.org> <0BA8DEFD-9E73-4A6A-A9E6-1957634CABF8@warski.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:09:02 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Passive scanning of iBeacons results in a "Data Buffer Overflow" From: Anderson Lizardo To: Adam Warski Cc: BlueZ development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Adam, Duplicate filtering is done inside the controller. If you disable filtering, the controller will receive a lot more packets (the quantity will depend on device's advertising parameters, but it is several times more packets). Even if your Gimbal device changes address on every packet (which is unusual, usually address changes are time based), what you actually see without using --duplicate is still a small fraction of what the controller receives over the air. Try comparing Gimbal on using --duplicates versus not using (instead of comparing different devices with different firmware and adv. parameters). Try counting number of adv. reports on both situations. I expect to see a lot more when --duplicate is enabled... Regarding the logs, it seems your dmesg.txt seems only to show the last lines of debugging... maybe the dmesg buffer is too short. Can you check if there is a more complete log generated in one of the /var/log/kern.log.* files ? Fortunately, It contains one snippet showing problems with HCI reassembly from USB packets: [ 878.184532] btusb_intr_complete: hci0 urb d9a8d300 status 0 count 16 [ 878.185499] btusb_intr_complete: hci0 urb d9a8d300 status 0 count 16 [ 878.186498] btusb_intr_complete: hci0 urb d9a8d300 status 0 count 12 [ 878.386548] btusb_intr_complete: hci0 urb d9a8d300 status 0 count 16 [ 878.387530] btusb_intr_complete: hci0 urb d9a8d300 status 0 count 16 [ 878.387664] hci_rx_work: hci0 [ 878.387693] hci_send_to_monitor: hdev d9a4e000 len 64 [ 878.387783] hci_send_to_sock: hdev d9a4e000 len 64 [ 878.387803] hci_rx_work: hci0 Event packet [ 878.387822] hci_event_packet: hci0 event 0xbc [ 878.387847] hci_send_to_monitor: hdev d9a4e000 len 4 [ 878.387896] hci_send_to_sock: hdev d9a4e000 len 4 [ 878.387913] hci_rx_work: hci0 Event packet [ 878.387930] hci_req_cmd_complete: opcode 0x200c status 0x00 [ 878.387945] hci_sent_cmd_data: hci0 opcode 0x200c [ 878.387959] hci_event_packet: hci0 event 0x00 [ 878.388058] hci_sock_recvmsg: sock da567840, sk daa9c800 It contains 3 bogus events: > HCI Event: Unknown (0xbc) plen 62 > HCI Event: Unknown (0x00) plen 2 > HCI Event: Physical Link Complete (0x40) plen 127 For me, it still points out to corrupted/truncated USB packets. Unfortunately, it is just indirect evidence as the logs don't show raw USB packets. But you can definitively confirm by using a USB sniffer tool. I recommend using tshark (wireshark's command line interface). It works just fine on raspberry. See this post for instructions: http://nagaraj-embedded.blogspot.com.br/2012/03/capturing-usb-data-through-wireshark.html Note that on raspberry there is just "usbmon1" (i.e. Bus 1), and everything is attached to it. So the logs will get other unrelated traffic (like ethernet packets), but wireshark GUI is powerful enough to filter only traffic related to a specific device. Best Regards, -- Anderson Lizardo http://www.indt.org/?lang=en INdT - Manaus - Brazil