Return-Path: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:38:43 +0100 From: Sander Eikelenboom Message-ID: <1295963563.20140310093843@eikelenboom.it> To: Sander Eikelenboom , Marcel Holtmann , "Gustavo F. Padovan" , Peter Hurley , Linus Torvalds CC: "bluez mailin list (linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org)" , linux-kernel Subject: [RC6 Bell Chime] Re: [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes In-Reply-To: <1335661753.20140303203853@eikelenboom.it> References: <1391997564-1805-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <3E0F3723-029F-4B12-8D77-9790FDBD3227@holtmann.org> <1259174563.20140212120644@eikelenboom.it> <1335661753.20140303203853@eikelenboom.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-ID: Hi all, Since: - 3.14-RC6 has been cut - this regression is known and reported since the merge window - the fix (revert of 3 patches) is known for over a month now - but it's still not in mainline - my polite ping request from last week seems to have provoked exactly 0 (zero) response. IT'S TIME TO CHIME SOME BELLS :-) Hope that WILL be heard somewhere ... -- Sander PS. on the informative side the 3 commits to be reverted are: f86772af6a0f643d3e13eb3f4f9213ae0c333ee4 Bluetooth: Remove rfcomm_carrier_raised() 4a2fb3ecc7467c775b154813861f25a0ddc11aa0 Bluetooth: Always wait for a connection on RFCOMM open() e228b63390536f5b737056059a9a04ea016b1abf Bluetooth: Move rfcomm_get_device() before rfcomm_dev_activate() Monday, March 3, 2014, 8:38:53 PM, you wrote: > Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 12:06:44 PM, you wrote: >> Monday, February 10, 2014, 11:09:38 PM, you wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>>> This patch series addresses a number of previously unknown issues >>>> with the RFCOMM tty device implementation, in addition to >>>> addressing the locking regression recently reported [1]. >>>> >>>> As Gianluca suggested and I agree, this series first reverts >>>> 3 of the 4 patches of 3.14-rc1 for bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c. >>> so for 3.14 we should revert 3 patches. And then the other 21 are intended for 3.15 merge window. >>> I realize that we still have to deal with some breakage, but we do not want regressions and I clearly not going to take 24 patches for 3.14 at this point in time. >>> What I can do is take all 24 patches into bluetooth-next and let them sit for 1 week and have people test them. And then we go ahead with reverting 3 patches from 3.14. Does that make sense? >> Reverting those 3 patches works for me. >> -- >> Sander >>> Regards >>> Marcel > Hi Marcel, > Ping... it seems these 3 reverts are still not in 3.14-rc5 to fix the regressions ? > -- > Sander -- Best regards, Sander mailto:linux@eikelenboom.it