Return-Path: Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 10:55:29 +0300 From: Johan Hedberg To: Andrei Emeltchenko Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Fix using address of array instead of size Message-ID: <20140623075529.GA29804@t440s> References: <1403186136-30041-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> <1403186136-30041-9-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1403186136-30041-9-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andrei, On Thu, Jun 19, 2014, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > --- > src/device.c | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) I've pushed patches 1-8 (with fixes to 7 and 8 due to messed up indentation). This one doesn't make much sense though: > diff --git a/src/device.c b/src/device.c > index a9b644b..2003c7f 100644 > --- a/src/device.c > +++ b/src/device.c > @@ -595,7 +595,11 @@ static gboolean dev_property_get_name(const GDBusPropertyTable *property, > struct btd_device *device = data; > const char *empty = "", *ptr; > > - ptr = device->name ?: empty; > + if (strlen(device->name) > 0) > + ptr = device->name; > + else > + ptr = empty; Why do you need the whole "empty" variable here? If strlen(device->name) is 0 then you've got the exact same thing: a pointer to an empty string. So to me it seems that this snippet should be changed to simply: ptr = device->name; Johan