Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B9274DB4-C0B2-42C2-A858-A23C241F84EB@holtmann.org>
References: <CACUGKYNrsWu6k4q193FsLmCc-fMJ955j6TRdnx=LfqFqcQfrmg@mail.gmail.com>
	<15262F73-F609-40F5-9294-9B35F5CB7C8C@holtmann.org>
	<CACUGKYNYg=XUXjDZVC9J74bczn+LJEUszH_HtD1Sea7EsWJfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<B9274DB4-C0B2-42C2-A858-A23C241F84EB@holtmann.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 19:00:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CACUGKYP4-iGOh3BogPeXUMF4eihNW57SKwD_+Aot7w466yfojQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bluetooth certification with bluez stack
From: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@gmail.com>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Thanks for the info.

Regards,

John

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I would prefer if you do not top post on this mailing list.
>
>> I have a follow up question for you.
>>
>> 1. If I used the PTS tool and (assuming) all the test were passed.
>> This means I do not have to go to the test house, I could use the PTS
>> info against my device as evidence that my device comply with the
>> bluetooth sig requirements and they will recognize it?.
>>
>> 2. Does PTS is enough to verify L2CAP, GAP, SDP, SPP, RFCOMM, AVCTP,
>> AVDTP and ATT, GATT, SM protocols?.
>
> in theory it is possible to self-qualify just using PTS. I personally have not done it yet.
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>