Return-Path: <cyrus@holtmann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Bluetooth certification with bluez stack
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACUGKYNYg=XUXjDZVC9J74bczn+LJEUszH_HtD1Sea7EsWJfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 18:52:11 -0700
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Message-Id: <B9274DB4-C0B2-42C2-A858-A23C241F84EB@holtmann.org>
References: <CACUGKYNrsWu6k4q193FsLmCc-fMJ955j6TRdnx=LfqFqcQfrmg@mail.gmail.com> <15262F73-F609-40F5-9294-9B35F5CB7C8C@holtmann.org> <CACUGKYNYg=XUXjDZVC9J74bczn+LJEUszH_HtD1Sea7EsWJfdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>

Hi John,

I would prefer if you do not top post on this mailing list.

> I have a follow up question for you.
> 
> 1. If I used the PTS tool and (assuming) all the test were passed.
> This means I do not have to go to the test house, I could use the PTS
> info against my device as evidence that my device comply with the
> bluetooth sig requirements and they will recognize it?.
> 
> 2. Does PTS is enough to verify L2CAP, GAP, SDP, SPP, RFCOMM, AVCTP,
> AVDTP and ATT, GATT, SM protocols?.

in theory it is possible to self-qualify just using PTS. I personally have not done it yet.

Regards

Marcel