Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20141204081557.GA5790@aemeltch-MOBL1> References: <1417615733-7350-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> <20141204081557.GA5790@aemeltch-MOBL1> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 11:19:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] unit/gatt: Fix using possible negative return value From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz To: Andrei Emeltchenko , Luiz Augusto von Dentz , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andrei, On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > Hi Luiz, > > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 08:35:41PM +0200, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote: >> Hi Andrei, >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko >> wrote: >> > From: Andrei Emeltchenko >> > >> > --- >> > unit/test-gatt.c | 4 ++-- >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c >> > index 03a66b9..f20da91 100644 >> > --- a/unit/test-gatt.c >> > +++ b/unit/test-gatt.c >> > @@ -648,11 +648,11 @@ static void test_server(gconstpointer data) >> > >> > len = write(context->fd, pdu.data, pdu.size); >> > >> > + g_assert_cmpint(len, ==, pdu.size); >> > + >> > if (g_test_verbose()) >> > util_hexdump('<', pdu.data, len, test_debug, "GATT: "); >> > >> > - g_assert_cmpint(len, ==, pdu.size); >> > - >> > execute_context(context); >> > } >> > >> > -- >> > 1.9.1 >> >> What changes does this make? > > You do not use negative len in case of error in util_hexdump() Well then I guess this should be part of the path description. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz