Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1417615733-7350-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> References: <1417615733-7350-1-git-send-email-Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 20:35:41 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] unit/gatt: Fix using possible negative return value From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz To: Andrei Emeltchenko Cc: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Andrei, On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > From: Andrei Emeltchenko > > --- > unit/test-gatt.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/unit/test-gatt.c b/unit/test-gatt.c > index 03a66b9..f20da91 100644 > --- a/unit/test-gatt.c > +++ b/unit/test-gatt.c > @@ -648,11 +648,11 @@ static void test_server(gconstpointer data) > > len = write(context->fd, pdu.data, pdu.size); > > + g_assert_cmpint(len, ==, pdu.size); > + > if (g_test_verbose()) > util_hexdump('<', pdu.data, len, test_debug, "GATT: "); > > - g_assert_cmpint(len, ==, pdu.size); > - > execute_context(context); > } > > -- > 1.9.1 What changes does this make? -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz