Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <003e01d00ec8$0b325380$2196fa80$@samsung.com> References: <1416577665-21876-1-git-send-email-vikram.pal@samsung.com> <003e01d00ec8$0b325380$2196fa80$@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:02:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] L2CAP control field + AVRCP browsing PDU parsing From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz To: Vikrampal Cc: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , Dmitry Kasatkin , cpgs@samsung.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Vikram, On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Vikrampal wrote: > Hi Luiz, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz [mailto:luiz.dentz@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 2:07 PM >> To: Vikrampal Yadav >> Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org; Dmitry Kasatkin; cpgs@samsung.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] L2CAP control field + AVRCP browsing PDU parsing >> >> Hi Vikram, >> >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Vikrampal Yadav >> wrote: >> > Support for ERTM control bytes adjustment, parsing L2CAP extended >> > control field and AVRCP SetBrowsedPlayer added in Bluetooth monitor. >> > >> > Vikrampal Yadav (7): >> > monitor: Adjust for ERTM control bytes >> > monitor: Make the parameter name generic >> > monitor: Add functionality to store extented control in DB >> > monitor: Extract extended L2CAP extended control field >> > monitor: Add support for parsing L2CAP extended control field >> > monitor: Add support for parsing L2CAP control field >> > monitor: Add AVRCP SetBrowsedPlayer support >> > >> > monitor/avctp.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++- monitor/l2cap.c | 242 >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> > 2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > >> > -- >> > 1.9.1 >> >> Sorry for the delay, this one got lost in my inbox, most patches seems to be >> missing the output they generate, could you please add it. > > Most patches in this series are helper patches for the last patch in this series. > The final patch actually prints the output which shows the work done by > Other patches. Actually from patch 4/7 onward they all print different output and I remember commenting before that I want to see then in the patches so we can avoid format errors, typos etc. -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz