Return-Path: Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:47:45 +0200 From: Johan Hedberg To: Jakub Pawlowski Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] Bluetooth: Add le_scan_restart Message-ID: <20150116104745.GA1630@t440s.lan> References: <1421240985-28944-1-git-send-email-jpawlowski@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1421240985-28944-1-git-send-email-jpawlowski@google.com> Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Jakub, On Wed, Jan 14, 2015, Jakub Pawlowski wrote: > +static void le_scan_restart_work_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status, > + u16 opcode) > +{ > + BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name); > + if (status) { > + BT_ERR("Failed to restart LE scan: status %d", status); > + } else if (test_bit(HCI_QUIRK_STRICT_DUPLICATE_FILTER, &hdev->quirks) && > + hdev->discovery.scan_end != 0) { > + long timeout = hdev->discovery.scan_end - jiffies; To make this consistent with the coding style, could you please format it as: if (status) { BT_ERR(...); return; } if (!test_bit(DUP_FILT) || !hdev->discovery_scan_end) return; timeout = ...; > +static void le_scan_restart_work(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct hci_dev *hdev = container_of(work, struct hci_dev, > + le_scan_restart.work); > + struct hci_request req; > + struct hci_cp_le_set_scan_enable cp; > + int err; > + > + BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name); > + > + /* If controller is not scanning we are done. */ > + if (!test_bit(HCI_LE_SCAN, &hdev->dev_flags)) > + return; Shouldn't you also make sure to cancel this delayed work wherever the code clears the HCI_LE_SCAN flag? (i.e. in hci_event.c) Johan