Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <54DD4502.6000304@lwfinger.net> References: <1423786087-7354-1-git-send-email-drake@endlessm.com> <54DD4502.6000304@lwfinger.net> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:31:54 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Bluetooth: btusb: Add Realtek 8723A/8723B/8761A/8821A support From: Daniel Drake To: Larry Finger Cc: Marcel Holtmann , "Gustavo F. Padovan" , Johan Hedberg , Linux Bluetooth mailing list , =?UTF-8?B?6ZmI6Imz6JCN?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-ID: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Larry Finger wrote: >> +#define RTL_EPATCH_SIGNATURE "Realtech" > > > Typo here. It should be Realtek. If it is a typo, it is a typo from Realtek :) The firmware includes this signature and it is what the vendor code checks for. const uint8_t RTK_EPATCH_SIGNATURE[8] = {0x52, 0x65, 0x61, 0x6C, 0x74, 0x65, 0x63, 0x68}; >> +#define RTL_ROM_LMP_3499 0x3499 >> +#define RTL_ROM_LMP_8723A 0x1200 >> +#define RTL_ROM_LMP_8723B 0x8723 >> +#define RTL_ROM_LMP_8821A 0x8821 >> +#define RTL_ROM_LMP_8761A 0x8761 > > > I just got a report for an lmp_subversion of 0x4ce1 on an RTL8723BE. The > above list and the table below may need expanding. We are still testing. Keep in mind, it is normal for the lmp_subversion to change once the firmware has been uploaded. That list is only a list of firmware versions that must be replaced. Daniel