Return-Path: Message-ID: <555D2A8E.7040805@qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:45:02 -0700 From: Ben Young Tae Kim MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chanyeol Park CC: Marcel Holtmann , , "Kim, Ben Young Tae" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Support for QCA61x4 on Samsung References: <1432017670-6024-1-git-send-email-chanyeol.park@samsung.com> <555C7F93.9080901@samsung.com> <555C819A.40600@samsung.com> <555CCA62.10809@qca.qualcomm.com> <1432168603.2474.20.camel@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1432168603.2474.20.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Chanyeol, On 05/20/15 17:36, Chanyeol Park wrote: > Hi,Ben Kim > > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:54 -0700, Ben Young Tae Kim wrote: >> Hi Chan-yeol, >> >> On 05/20/15 05:44, Chan-yeol Park wrote: >>> Hi Marcel, >>> >>> On 05/20/2015 09:35 PM, Chan-yeol Park wrote: >>>> Hi Marcel, >>>> On 05/20/2015 03:21 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >>>>> Hi Chan-yeol, >>>>>> The previous commit(3267c88) regressed QCA61x4 BT on Samsung >>>>>> because its device info is missed in qca_devices_table[], so >>>>>> btusb_open() return error unexpectedly. >>>>> how does this regress. We never had QCA module support in the >>>>> first place. The patch looks good, I was just wondering what >>>>> the regression will be here? >>>> My environment was virtual box on windows. >>>> I guess windows download QC firmware successfully, so without >>>> firmware handling in the linux I could use bluetooth adapter. >>>> >> I didn't realize ROME v2.0 was out to the market. Where did you get >> this module? Does it built-in on your laptop? > Yes. It's built-in in my Samsung labtop bought on market. > >> Your patch looks good, however, I need your confirmation that it will >> work on your board since I don't have ROME v2.0 HW. I'll send you >> ROME v2.0 FW files for you and will upstream it to linux-firmware.git >> if it works. > It works well. I test basic things such as searching, sdp, and pairing. > and they works fine. > > Actually before I use your driver/firmware, my "hciconfig -a" shows > wrong address and hci 4.0. but thanks to your driver/firmware I could > get hci 4.1 and normal address. >> >>>> Until now , I fail to find the exact firmware , >>>> "qca/rampatch_usb_*.bin" for QCA61x4. >>>> I just saw the mail that Kyle McMartin reject firmware patches >>>> made by Ben Young Tae Kim. >>>> Could you tell where I can get it? >>>> >>>> Actually my wifi QCA61x4 does not work well.. >> QCA61x4 WiFi will use 'ATH10k' driver. Did you enable this module >> compiled on your kernel tree > No. I just use fedora 22, 4.0.3-300.fc22.x86_64. In case of wifi they > use PCI, so it's not easy to use it in guest os that use latest kernel > tree. > > Also I search some mail thread for ath10k, it seems that firmware is > not added in linux-firmware until now. >>> I am sending this mail again because previous mail is not sent to >>> bluetooth-next due to HTML format. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Chanyeol >>> >> Thanks >> -- Ben Kim > I appreciate your help a lot. I could use my Bluetooth on my labtop > from now on. Thanks for your time & feedback. I'm going to send firmware patch to linux-firmware soon. > Thanks > Chanyeol > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Thanks -- Ben Kim