Return-Path: Message-id: <555C819A.40600@samsung.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:44:10 +0900 From: Chan-yeol Park MIME-version: 1.0 To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: chanyeol.park@gmail.com, ytkim@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, Kim@samsung.com, Ben Young Tae Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Support for QCA61x4 on Samsung References: <1432017670-6024-1-git-send-email-chanyeol.park@samsung.com> <555C7F93.9080901@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <555C7F93.9080901@samsung.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Marcel, On 05/20/2015 09:35 PM, Chan-yeol Park wrote: > Hi Marcel, > On 05/20/2015 03:21 AM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >> >> Hi Chan-yeol, >>> >>> The previous commit(3267c88) regressed QCA61x4 BT on Samsung because >>> its device info is missed in qca_devices_table[], so btusb_open() >>> return error unexpectedly. >> >> how does this regress. We never had QCA module support in the first >> place. The patch looks good, I was just wondering what the regression >> will be here? > My environment was virtual box on windows. > I guess windows download QC firmware successfully, so without firmware > handling in the linux I could use bluetooth adapter. > > Until now , I fail to find the exact firmware , > "qca/rampatch_usb_*.bin" for QCA61x4. > I just saw the mail that Kyle McMartin reject firmware patches made by > Ben Young Tae Kim. > Could you tell where I can get it? > > Actually my wifi QCA61x4 does not work well.. I am sending this mail again because previous mail is not sent to bluetooth-next due to HTML format. Thanks Chanyeol