Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150517134635.GA3114@t440s.P-661HNU-F1> References: <5558987E.5040604@gmail.com> <20150517134635.GA3114@t440s.P-661HNU-F1> Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 21:22:26 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What am I missing? From: Florian Grandel To: BlueZ development , Arman Uguray , Marcel Holtmann Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11409f183f044105165030e7 List-ID: --001a11409f183f044105165030e7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hi Florian, > > On Sun, May 17, 2015, Florian Grandel wrote: > > Hi Marcel and Johan, > > > > here is what I did so far: > > > > - I asked you whether contributions from newcomers are welcome (which Marcel > > agreed to), > > > > - I coordinated the development target and approach with Marcel to make sure > > that my contribution will be generally useful and acceptable, > > > > - I read lots of documentation to make sure that I'm asking as few redundant > > questions as possible, > > > > - I invested a considerable amount of time to put a useful contribution > > together, > > > > - Arman invested a considerable amount of time to review it, > > > > - I again invested a considerable amount of time to work in all review > > comments. > > > > - I waited for several weeks and pinged you several times to get you to do > > your part as maintainers... > > > > What am I missing?? Did I overlook your response? Or is this the "normal" > > Kernel community approach? > > No need to get worried or frustrated about your set. It hasn't been > forgotten about and it hasn't lost the chance to get included in the > first possible kernel release, i.e. 4.2. It'll very likely go into a > bluetooth-next pull request before the 4.2 merge window opens. > > For my part I have no major objections after reading it through a couple > of times - I remember Marcel saying he'd take a look after Arman's > review, which is what I've mostly be waiting for. But in no case has > your set been forgotten. > Ok, cool. Thanks for letting me know. I really got frustrated w/o getting any feedback but now it's ok. :) --001a11409f183f044105165030e7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

>
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015, Florian Grandel wrote:
> > Hi Marcel and Johan,
> >
> > here is what I did so far:
> >
> > - I asked you whether contributions from newcomers are welcome (which Marcel
> > agreed to),
> >
> > - I coordinated the development target and approach with Marcel to make sure
> > that my contribution will be generally useful and acceptable,
> >
> > - I read lots of documentation to make sure that I'm asking as few redundant
> > questions as possible,
> >
> > - I invested a considerable amount of time to put a useful contribution
> > together,
> >
> > - Arman invested a considerable amount of time to review it,
> >
> > - I again invested a considerable amount of time to work in all review
> > comments.
> >
> > - I waited for several weeks and pinged you several times to get you to do
> > your part as maintainers...
> >
> > What am I missing?? Did I overlook your response? Or is this the "normal"
> > Kernel community approach?
>
> No need to get worried or frustrated about your set. It hasn't been
> forgotten about and it hasn't lost the chance to get included in the
> first possible kernel release, i.e. 4.2. It'll very likely go into a
> bluetooth-next pull request before the 4.2 merge window opens.
>
> For my part I have no major objections after reading it through a couple
> of times - I remember Marcel saying he'd take a look after Arman's
> review, which is what I've mostly be waiting for. But in no case has
> your set been forgotten.
>

Ok, cool. Thanks for letting me know. I really got frustrated w/o getting any feedback but now it's ok. :)

--001a11409f183f044105165030e7--