Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <799E44F0-0095-4281-9850-5A5A53C3D413@holtmann.org> References: <1457106781-8566-1-git-send-email-szymon.janc@codecoup.pl> <1457106781-8566-2-git-send-email-szymon.janc@codecoup.pl> <799E44F0-0095-4281-9850-5A5A53C3D413@holtmann.org> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 16:34:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] doc: Add DeviceClassic1 and DeviceSmart1 interfaces From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Szymon Janc , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 List-ID: Hi Marcel, On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote= : > Hi Szymon, > >> This interfaces will provide per tranport capabilities of remote >> devices. Eventually leading to deprecation of Device1 interface. > > so I not like the naming DeviceClassic1 and DeviceSmart1 at all. Nobody u= ses these terms widely that they are easily recognizable and can be associa= ted. I also do not want to follow Bluetooth SIG marketing and logo terms. T= hey might change and then we are stuck with it. IMO they are better than LE and BR/EDR, but perhaps you have something better in mind. Btw, this does bring the question if we should do something similar to the Adapter interface, although there are a little less conflicts because there more LE specific interfaces. --=20 Luiz Augusto von Dentz