Return-Path: Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:21:57 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Afzal Mohammed Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Gustavo Padovan , Johan Hedberg , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] Bluetooth: ath3k: Silence uninitialized variable warning Message-ID: <20160423072157.GD17913@mwanda> References: <20160422100255.GE11398@mwanda> <20160423064745.GA4826@afzalpc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160423064745.GA4826@afzalpc> List-ID: On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:17:45PM +0530, Afzal Mohammed wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > > - int err, pipe, len, size, count, sent = 0; > > + int len = 0; > > + int err, pipe, size, count, sent = 0; > > Is there any particular reason to avoid more than 1 variable > initialization in definition on a single line ?, like, > > int err, pipe, size, count, sent = 0, len = 0; > > have observed that none of your uninitialized variable warning fixes > does as mentioned above. That sort of initialization is slightly less readable... regards, dan carpenter