Return-Path: Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:45:06 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Salvatore Benedetto Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [cryptodev:master 79/79] (.text+0x330de0): multiple definition of `ecdh_shared_secret' Message-ID: <20160624064506.GA17229@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <201606240302.rtIGIxRf%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20160624060649.GA21165@localhost> <20160624061012.GA16850@gondor.apana.org.au> <20160624062316.GA16985@gondor.apana.org.au> <20160624063644.GA21443@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20160624063644.GA21443@localhost> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:44AM +0100, Salvatore Benedetto wrote: > > > The patch was based on the current tree. I just pulled. > There is not point in moving to lib because bluetooth is > about to be converted to kpp. > That patch I believe will go up the bluetooth tree, so > my suggestion is to simply accept that I fail to properly > name that symbol. > > Renaming the symbol in net/bluetooth/ecc which I think will conflict > with the patch where I remove it completely which, again, I believe > will go up the BT tree. OK I will have no option but to revert your patches then. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt