Return-Path: From: Arnd Bergmann To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" Cc: Sebastian Reichel , One Thousand Gnomes , Oleksij Rempel , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Marcel Holtmann , Jiri Slaby , Pavel Machek , Peter Hurley , NeilBrown , Linus Walleij , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] UART slave device bus Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:43:00 +0200 Message-ID: <7864389.KcZiMyceNA@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: References: <20160818011445.22726-1-robh@kernel.org> <20160822203947.ksxwnvzhc3tpnnx7@earth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" List-ID: On Monday, August 22, 2016 11:23:26 PM CEST H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > I see what you mean, but kernel divides between directly connected UART and USB-connected UART. > > drivers/usb/serial/ vs. drivers/tty/serial/ That distinction purely exists for historic reasons. I'd argue that the former should actually go into drivers/tty/usb or similar. A long time ago, we commonly sorted device drivers by how they were attached to the system (as drivers/usb/serial/ and drivers/usb/storage still do), but almost everything is now sorted according to how it is used instead. Arnd