Return-Path: Message-ID: <1509103771.19297.1.camel@hadess.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ] obexd: Fix compile error due to lack of header From: Bastien Nocera To: ERAMOTO Masaya , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:29:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1158c872-8eb3-b710-5013-fa04bfebd745@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <0ff16352-9a23-f0b1-5691-d521b36dcd8c@jp.fujitsu.com> <1509021568.28409.34.camel@hadess.net> <1158c872-8eb3-b710-5013-fa04bfebd745@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2017-10-27 at 16:55 +0900, ERAMOTO Masaya wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > On 10/26/2017 09:39 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 15:05 +0900, ERAMOTO Masaya wrote: > > > When compiling with gcc 7.2.0, gcc outputs the following > > > messages. > > > This patch adds the header stdlib.h to each obex-related header > > > including > > > functions with the type ssize_t, so the same problem does not > > > also > > > happen > > > in case using there headers individually. > > > > I already sent a patch for this about 2 months ago, look for > > "obexd: > > Fix compilation error on F27" > > Sorry for I had missed this patch. > > Now, it seems that you are blocking the patch set including this > patch > due to that Florian commented about one of the patch set. I'm not blocking anything, it didn't get reviewed at all. > Is there any > upgrades for the patch set? The patch set is just a bunch of unrelated fixes, the patches can be committed individually. I think one of us needs to figure out what the change is to put the justification in the commit message before that's going to be accepted though.