Return-Path: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:56:08 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Danis Cc: Marcel Holtmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Johan Hovold , Rob Herring , Sebastian Reichel , Loic Poulain , Lukas Wunner , Hans de Goede , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ACPI serdev support Message-ID: <20171018145608.GB27138@kroah.com> References: <1507710734-32520-1-git-send-email-frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com> <20171011090354.GS4269@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: List-ID: On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 04:46:05PM +0200, Fr?d?ric Danis wrote: > Hi Greg, Rafael, Marcel, > > Le 11/10/2017 ? 20:32, Marcel Holtmann a ?crit?: > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > Add ACPI support for serial attached devices. > > > > > > > > > > Currently, serial devices are not set as enumerated during ACPI scan for SPI > > > > > or i2c buses (but not for UART). This should also be done for UART serial > > > > > devices. > > > > > I renamed *spi_i2c_slave* to *serial_bus_slave* to reflect this. > > > > > > > > > > This needs Johan Hovold's "serdev: fix registration of second slave" patch. > > > > In theory this series could go in through the acpi-tree without my > > > > fix. It would only affect an error case where an unlikely failure to > > > > register an ACPI serdev device, would prevent the tty-class device from > > > > being registered instead of the controller. That is, something we can > > > > live with until this all converges in 4.15-rc1 if needed. > > > > > > > > That said, I think we should consider taking all serdev changes, and > > > > therefore also the ACPI patch, through the tty tree instead in order to > > > > avoid merge conflicts. Rafael? > > > OK > > > > > > Please feel free to add > > > > > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > to the ACPI core change. > > > > > > And I will assume that this series will go in via the tty tree. > > you have to take these two patches now via the TTY tree now. In case you already marked them as someone else problem ;) > > > > Regards > > > > Marcel > > Is there any problem I missed with those patches? > Do I have to re-send them? No, they are in my queue, still catching up... thanks, greg k-h