Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ACPI serdev support To: Marcel Holtmann , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Johan Hovold , Rob Herring , Sebastian Reichel , Loic Poulain , Lukas Wunner , Hans de Goede , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" , ACPI Devel Maling List References: <1507710734-32520-1-git-send-email-frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com> <20171011090354.GS4269@localhost> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fr=c3=a9d=c3=a9ric_Danis?= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:46:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-ID: Hi Greg, Rafael, Marcel, Le 11/10/2017 à 20:32, Marcel Holtmann a écrit : > Hi Greg, > >>>> Add ACPI support for serial attached devices. >>>> >>>> Currently, serial devices are not set as enumerated during ACPI scan for SPI >>>> or i2c buses (but not for UART). This should also be done for UART serial >>>> devices. >>>> I renamed *spi_i2c_slave* to *serial_bus_slave* to reflect this. >>>> >>>> This needs Johan Hovold's "serdev: fix registration of second slave" patch. >>> In theory this series could go in through the acpi-tree without my >>> fix. It would only affect an error case where an unlikely failure to >>> register an ACPI serdev device, would prevent the tty-class device from >>> being registered instead of the controller. That is, something we can >>> live with until this all converges in 4.15-rc1 if needed. >>> >>> That said, I think we should consider taking all serdev changes, and >>> therefore also the ACPI patch, through the tty tree instead in order to >>> avoid merge conflicts. Rafael? >> OK >> >> Please feel free to add >> >> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> to the ACPI core change. >> >> And I will assume that this series will go in via the tty tree. > you have to take these two patches now via the TTY tree now. In case you already marked them as someone else problem ;) > > Regards > > Marcel Is there any problem I missed with those patches? Do I have to re-send them? Regards, Fred