Return-Path: Message-ID: <1529029805.29697.27.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] serdev: add dev_pm_domain_attach|detach() From: Sean Wang To: Ulf Hansson CC: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Marcel Holtmann , Johan Hedberg , , , Linux ARM , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Jiri Slaby" , Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:30:05 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 10:58 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 at 09:14, wrote: > > > > From: Sean Wang > > > > In order to open up the required power gate before any operation can be > > effectively performed over the serial bus between CPU and serdev, it's > > clearly essential to add common attach functions for PM domains to serdev > > at the probe phase. > > > > Similarly, the relevant dettach function for the PM domains should be > > properly and reversely added at the remove phase. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang > > Cc: Rob Herring > > Cc: Ulf Hansson > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > Cc: Jiri Slaby > > Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > drivers/tty/serdev/core.c | 14 +++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c > > index df93b72..c93d8ee 100644 > > --- a/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serdev/core.c > > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > > > @@ -330,8 +331,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(serdev_device_set_tiocm); > > static int serdev_drv_probe(struct device *dev) > > { > > const struct serdev_device_driver *sdrv = to_serdev_device_driver(dev->driver); > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = dev_pm_domain_attach(dev, true); > > + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) { > > From 4.18 rc1 via commit 919b7308fcc4, dev_pm_domain_attach() will > return better error codes. > > I suggest to change the above error path to: > if (ret) > return ret; > > Then continue with the probing below. Thanks for sharing me the information. I'll happily respin using the patch because it makes the most sense. > > > + ret = sdrv->probe(to_serdev_device(dev)); > > + if (ret) > > + dev_pm_domain_detach(dev, true); > > + } > > > > - return sdrv->probe(to_serdev_device(dev)); > > + return ret; > > } > > > > static int serdev_drv_remove(struct device *dev) > > @@ -339,6 +348,9 @@ static int serdev_drv_remove(struct device *dev) > > const struct serdev_device_driver *sdrv = to_serdev_device_driver(dev->driver); > > if (sdrv->remove) > > sdrv->remove(to_serdev_device(dev)); > > + > > + dev_pm_domain_detach(dev, true); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > Otherwise, this makes sense to me! > really thanks for your review! > Kind regards > Uffe