Return-Path: Message-ID: <1533652445.3472.230.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] Bluetooth: mediatek: Add protocol support for MediaTek serial devices From: Sean Wang To: Marcel Holtmann CC: Mark Rutland , devicetree , Johan Hedberg , , "open list:BLUETOOTH DRIVERS" , Rob Herring , , linux-arm-kernel Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 22:34:05 +0800 In-Reply-To: <7A3537C5-5940-45AD-AB80-77418CCFE130@holtmann.org> References: <1707FFA1-A294-4A95-A3BF-0910CE455232@holtmann.org> <1533192799.3472.122.camel@mtkswgap22> <1533199720.3472.136.camel@mtkswgap22> <9526E5D9-50BA-4D57-80F5-083DB7D28AFE@holtmann.org> <1533205495.3472.144.camel@mtkswgap22> <1533303749.3472.160.camel@mtkswgap22> <1533319214.3472.187.camel@mtkswgap22> <7A3537C5-5940-45AD-AB80-77418CCFE130@holtmann.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: On Mon, 2018-08-06 at 17:39 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Sean, > > >>>>>>>>>>> + [ ... ] > >> this is even more hackish since the __hci_cmd_sync_ev command is really meant to get a cmd status first before waiting for that event. > >> > > > > Understood. > > > > I've stopped the hack in v8. could we merge v8 first ? and then I will a fix up with __hci_raw_sync_ev that uses the hdev->raw_q instead of __hci_cmd_sync_ev in TODO. > > so I looked into this a bit more. We actually added __hci_cmd_send for a Qualcomm firmware loader that was doing something similar. So instead of trying to add a yet another command to the core, I actually used that and implemented the wait for vendor event in the driver. > > You will see my v9 on the mailing list. I also did a bunch of cosmetic minor cleanup and spelling correction. Please test this version. I also make __le16 dlen instead of dlen1 + dlen2 since I think that is what your hardware does. Only one thing needs to be corrected in v9. that is __be16 is required instead of dlen1 + dlen2. I will fix it up in v10 and the other changes all look good to me. > If this version of the driver works for you then I am happy to merge it. You can then add support for hdev->set_bdaddr and hdev->set_diag in later patches. I also like to clean up the STP receive handler since it can be done a lot simpler and smaller, but that has to wait. > hopefully v10 also can be merged :) I will investigate more about how to add ->set_bdaddr, ->set_diag and STP receive enhancement in later patches. but so far I have not much idea about how to make STP multiplexer be a independent driver. my thought is that it would be really better and cleaner a chain of serdev is be used as the base of mtkbtuart. something like 8250 serial bus <----> STP multiplexer serdev <----> mtkbtuart serdev however, STP multiplexer serdev is not a real device, that doesn't no request any resource. I think it should not be allowed to be added in a device tree and even in dt-binding document. > >> Are all Mediatek vendor commands this way? Or just the ones for loading the firmware? So only the WMT ones? > >> > > > > Only the WMT ones, WMT commands/events are usually used in system controlling, for example, global function on/off, firmware download, reset and so on. most only appear on device initialization > > Since you never checked the result of the vendor event, I opted for just signaling that it arrived. If they can report success or failure, we need to add some extra code for that. > I will consider more WMT event status when I add more Bluetooth devices such as MT7668U usb based Bluetooth which I plan to add the support in later patches in the next weeks > Regards > > Marcel > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek