DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8EE4D208E3
Date:   Sat, 10 Nov 2018 20:50:20 +0100
From:   Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>
To:     "Stotland, Inga" <inga.stotland@intel.com>
Cc:     "marcel@holtmann.org" <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Gix, Brian" <brian.gix@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ] doc: Initial Bluetooth Mesh API
Message-ID: <20181110195020.GA27197@jhedberg-mac01.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "Stotland, Inga" <inga.stotland@intel.com>,
        "marcel@holtmann.org" <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Gix, Brian" <brian.gix@intel.com>
References: <20181107004950.9153-1-inga.stotland@intel.com>
 <4DBB63ED-41C4-4F27-B2BC-1ADB090B1656@gmail.com>
 <c2485caca3145e8aaaa1a8396b294b46a55b97e3.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c2485caca3145e8aaaa1a8396b294b46a55b97e3.camel@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Inga,

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018, Stotland, Inga wrote:
> From D-Bus Api Design Guidelines: (
> https://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-api-design.html#api-versioning):
> 
> "In summary, version numbers should be included in all service names,
> interface names and object paths:
> 
>     com.example.MyService1
> 
>     com.example.MyService1.InterestingInterface
> 
>     com.example.MyService1.OtherInterface
> 
>     /com/example/MyService1/Manager
> 
>     /com/example/MyService1/OtherObject
> "
> 
> I chose to do the name versioning based on the official guidelines.
> However, if we want to preserve the historical bluez approach, I don't
> mind changing it.

That's a good point you've brought up, however I think we should stick
to consistency within the project in the first place.

Johan