Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0733CC43441 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC5D2243E for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="S6HaFvJg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BAC5D2243E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729451AbeKLWvf (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:51:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:43531 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726693AbeKLWvf (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:51:35 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id g59-v6so4328718plb.10 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 04:58:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WwzdVvlB3G6DIYMuvImRTKDB8GPFM8NhTNECvf8r6gw=; b=S6HaFvJgcW6vFMqDMxyfv47fRkVHuUveWDRIsMXFHUurDWcQRFi2WIodSSRUjLJoxf wNA97MVwDaMO6MzMbFITyFi6bHiRyaMs0sBGINZqUyKmq62ZopA5LF1VroOU+oVYDQnE xT2rO0d/tCKXRASlmERXF3mz2cghBuZXURaqD0xvOjvMfeC1l0Tl9tuLaxOfnDNzfaew Q0S1hqj8RzaZVrcc0FDuc11pRQ3bHnithcMgvxnDoTd4pItwNRb1U5GNiG/0OQ5M7W9I h5BQcnuZ6BUPxN5jIgpGfc1QlHQ3By4ZT/Hq7PbJhovfM64YNRCqa7BOl60UvPUEG+bL jMbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WwzdVvlB3G6DIYMuvImRTKDB8GPFM8NhTNECvf8r6gw=; b=PswPrGLnPLgsEn/jlBoO3k4f6PFBneWaUQnKCq6QrW0hn4cDwi92cyk216ATENibGm w8WRfqVzGeN1OZ3sqmEPTMOs7eAd9wuS+rqRv0oZzYJqJ9IPlGxlS7R5+tJhMEPkDYrs jvYjkUxCr5cM6tLnWdiOLQYm+DSdzExAnX47/hoJk/UGtDISlQA2cQ7emUzmuqS80lKa nbBMrzhSKEb6rX1cmRh12wkR6+L1pNq7u/UHAJAJ++bNc5mCHlKw9NpAi+BMLaAzGimk zd9qabvUl6Nxz9/DVNMoH+/AP/AuzOL8I+NHb0Qo8Prwgizqx7bmGBSeLg2XToLgfKFB TQiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIzmq7XO09sqtTuBYm7VDvwur7bFUWJ9rNBH1CHaiHToPSsmJdw NDL2VrH0LZXPPzxp7BDcw6tLPYRTfwY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fgw6RKppY/DLVCMa9+cWUQqBReM/DJVTnxbDzdRXN/MVhLrAM2RyeAsUJdMTKaRxm/eIxAaw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6bc9:: with SMTP id m9-v6mr889644plt.106.1542027503999; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 04:58:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ibflynnx-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([134.134.139.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 64-v6sm40550305pfa.120.2018.11.12.04.58.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 04:58:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ v2] doc: Initial Bluetooth Mesh API From: Johan Hedberg In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 13:58:07 +0100 Cc: "Stotland, Inga" , "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , Marcel Holtmann , "Gix, Brian" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4C0377DF-430B-4A2C-BA6E-CC4B9C6ED9F6@gmail.com> References: <20181112013317.5714-1-inga.stotland@intel.com> To: Luiz Von Dentz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1) Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Luiz > On 12 Nov 2018, at 13.24, Luiz Augusto von Dentz = wrote: >=20 > It seems wrong to me to have to send your own object as method > argument, usually this sort of communication goes as a Signal but it > seems the Element interface has no signal to be able to do something > like that. The problem with signals is that they cannot return an error, and I do = think we=E2=80=99d want to have the daemon return an error if it cannot = send the given message. Also, by default signals are broadcast, and it = feels a bit hawkish to do unicast destinations for them. Johan=