Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A442BC43387 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77103218D9 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 18:19:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=silvair-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@silvair-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="GjAEgRWs" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732379AbeLTSTL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:19:11 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f47.google.com ([209.85.167.47]:34347 "EHLO mail-lf1-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729178AbeLTSTL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 13:19:11 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f47.google.com with SMTP id p6so2098505lfc.1 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:19:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=silvair-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nUmJS9/u1ILqwLnopTBKuABuh3L5YYDObJRHyQXbVLQ=; b=GjAEgRWsFbo1sKvajyfXLof5Yjh30Wn1uC6lwI+5XsnCVxtFwPNVxSsLASU48OsDfe DXmMsLcitZbbHMHb5TCUTinGuZA3YBEMag9RPggL/rU5yqlzqmLtxmHlUXYfp0IMcrJE haIzNkVgNwAYiHob57VsaFfQDZRM8TzlNkGTdKNj9WUPgbMt60bvaDcyrLMPbxuSL6U1 /M8/I2/4enPHYZJ+FiSd3yyU+1JvjtuWUlMlpv32u6ipxRG7unrwRYZgE/vitTqsueyV Q3sQXnyuNTFXg9WBfZziPvPt69fL19Fi9kpshMf8WUwu2EXYkk7Mo5c8yfXTMSUA+xtb aZyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nUmJS9/u1ILqwLnopTBKuABuh3L5YYDObJRHyQXbVLQ=; b=NrOiibbbnPpNm0ehf3eip0NSUI1YWaTqi1xc9yAw3bY318dwAOZeWFwvyrj4K4QTnh WizuGPvagnLLdj4arxohRaX9/Xhc/jBaIIeCoRDG3vRxr8ksVOcpDbtkfXbQsFuRJzV0 uhuhLA1f0MQYkpL/tYpOTLf/C99ndZzsBCbxQqHXVJYRrwnMG2pH+FHVVHKFCpc1BmSs IpgCKDomvoMnBEpuG9dACJUktQZ6GeoGMXx7ZuZ6GRt/jqRKc4kVVLerMP31lFnOC1Pv mxaVry0YfJCrrmCOLCgekBU7klYEyEaqKs4PGNbIMXzrpHFJGHtYxXnjMzE4wWB5VXp8 kUgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZuXuOWdrpXfU5Ljcne2UwTyXS+aVUmenpK278CDrose/pIqWP4 st9AsOjZLlb17aU5PH3AOYIrH+j7BOM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/V5p3EpNQ9lVtazrxnPzNN/aUsW9C9fSTUyI4gjWE2ruHeNGq/51QpM9N4qrn4/gGOBU0w/vQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:7dc2:: with SMTP id y185mr15158342lfc.27.1545329949024; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from kynes (apn-31-2-85-140.dynamic.gprs.plus.pl. [31.2.85.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm4378073lfi.65.2018.12.20.10.19.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:19:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 19:19:05 +0100 From: Michal Lowas-Rzechonek To: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Advertising report address types in mesh-io-generic Message-ID: <20181220181905.3r4fv45qe3y6sq75@kynes> Mail-Followup-To: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" References: <20181220161707.lxrzzvknqa64pmyc@kynes> <20181220180318.gwsj6aflihlppbgu@kynes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org On 12/20, Gix, Brian wrote: > > says that "address type" in that event is one of: > > > > 0x00 Public Device Address > > 0x01 Random Device Address > > 0x02 Public Identity Address (Corresponds to Resolved Private Address) > > 0x03 Random (static) Identity Address (Corresponds to Resolved Private > > Address) > > > > and nowhere does it mention BR/EDR. > > > > I don't think we're supposed to even receive BR/EDR addresses via HCI LE > > Meta Event. > > I think you are probably correct. This may be a remnant that we picked up from code that was > intended to serve both BR/EDR and LE advertisements. I will remove that check first thing after > the existing patchset is applied. Thanks! \o/ Thanks for the work by the way, we're still digging into the codebase and getting our heads around it, but I'll make sure to give you folks a hand when we finally manage to add something substantial. cheers -- Michał Lowas-Rzechonek Silvair http://silvair.com Jasnogórska 44, 31-358 Krakow, POLAND