MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181117010748.24347-1-rajatja@google.com> <20190118223407.64818-1-rajatja@google.com>
 <C103ADA0-68A0-4571-AE47-1744E64E0D7E@holtmann.org>
In-Reply-To: <C103ADA0-68A0-4571-AE47-1744E64E0D7E@holtmann.org>
From:   Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:28:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CACK8Z6FzWTZ_SYCBqGsOcf2xzSp3+W9HD-1inyRtJ=Wqsww8Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] usb: split code locating ACPI companion into port
 and device
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc:     Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>,
        Alex Hung <alex.hung@canonical.com>,
        Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>,
        Raghuram Hegde <raghuram.hegde@intel.com>,
        chethan.tumkur.narayan@intel.com,
        "Ghorai, Sukumar" <sukumar.ghorai@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marcel,

On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rajat,
>
> > In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split
> > usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and
> > usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures.
> > v3: same as v1
> > v2: same as v1
> >
> > drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree?

Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you
have any objections / suggestions?

>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>