Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CF6C282C3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18DC20870 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:42:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="H+fiwqNo" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726225AbfAVWmk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:42:40 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:38493 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726127AbfAVWmk (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:42:40 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id c19-v6so173573lja.5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:42:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VZaokQwl9SY/X/XqBGguubg/MHwgfemvv46E+U/pJUI=; b=H+fiwqNoOcvcNZWQWfbjd2N4Yos2Y8HjtIZy3o+6FtirENKQocPD78+HRLOEAOUApV bfzWgpniV9kUYsJ11BItK/AgMIpEw4WnBRsYoR+zZve3KAudED8YCCPWwZYVgAzDIprP 9jfVKCphA2N3H22CJ3N1y/0tJNHCjwuTrPtXi6dxchNdR5ybLZhH2PyBo75dXyWyESph +27k5+J6bMX8GJu/smRLbB/996eJHOK1/kle8thHvfG2IhwEvLx7Go1aLZObnbBGwnUZ GlY8wixosxoigmxUHmQui7XLdR8idqjqvZjNslwb7wxqngJ+VO5d8plYtki656sN5/+C CWKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VZaokQwl9SY/X/XqBGguubg/MHwgfemvv46E+U/pJUI=; b=mosQfThIbg0sO9VZDGLKywVQpEPyenOI3XEXN27+cO+M7WYmFZpTxofH/QMDJSg1Rc xdC/xMvY/JmGHAEKjTy+T7uu3bkZA8rQ84vWzc7StgdkjLaGJVmC/BSB6J67XyqIz98y mXK9kgeZ9y8gNrBGFt8YTwDFyzaCOZQIrm7NS29FgEO0CIsfLQh/KXMTHTvR1CqLHJlF Ku8O3PbAuc0di7MOu4bAx8ex3r0Ofh0yZxmbyM1BF3H5nQz09W5Hif0G6Bn57UOBdCFm giRxmhoNCTreMulEUmg2rgVEDrbdpz7QiLrVOMe5CQ/5PSFayDJCVViBOKTG/hdwwVyM /n6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdAYju7LGzGYDRIw4Z1iMm90cZJxKVK5Y9PhGrQ7o9rmuqyAVrM yqEqNHKr8ycgTCk+abmm7REvh7zKfqszb1CJ4lQlGA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6wNCeiq6QpNe1OxJCB4vWA6uOSfhQBrIf5buaEctVVr8rj1u5HofMhBcQG+Mma/7YCYq9Mjk5ycvR29mP9aL4= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9556:: with SMTP id t22-v6mr15318213ljh.36.1548196958207; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:42:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181117010748.24347-1-rajatja@google.com> <20190118223407.64818-1-rajatja@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:42:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] usb: split code locating ACPI companion into port and device To: Rajat Jain , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Johan Hedberg , "David S. Miller" , Alex Hung , Bluez mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, netdev , Rajat Jain , Raghuram Hegde , chethan.tumkur.narayan@intel.com, "Ghorai, Sukumar" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:29 PM Rajat Jain wrote: > > Hi Marcel, > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > > Hi Rajat, > > > > > In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split > > > usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and > > > usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai > > > --- > > > v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures. > > > v3: same as v1 > > > v2: same as v1 > > > > > > drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > > > what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree? > > Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you > have any objections / suggestions? That's up to Greg, but since he'd acked the patches I'd assume he's OK with taking it through bluetooth. As an option Marcel could cut an immutable branch off 4.20 with the first 2 patches so that he and Greg can both pull it into their main branches and then git will do the right thing when Linus pulls from them. Lee uses quite a bit of them in MFD and other maintainers are known to occasionally make them for work that needs to be shared between trees. Thanks. -- Dmitry