Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED62DC43381 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C034D2087C for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="ZBYG5KyF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726630AbfCLQ7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:59:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:38933 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726451AbfCLQ7a (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 12:59:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id i20so2257428pfo.6 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:59:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=oZb6CACGM6VZGvUR+Ibx4EQn2QmozkbR6QSAW+dYXLM=; b=ZBYG5KyFEqg9qtHysYtsux5REdr5/Qo34GKc4sM/GAFU9HTtpiNrI2jZ4f1KZ5OUh5 h2ckGFXe61F6zTG4AFfpTsqtfdXBwdcR3u8jtCT28kuRymKnTpnfcumMsmEmY96oLqhu fgqobwQchJTVwZs4YQi4R/ZIIxiNjw+rddNCg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oZb6CACGM6VZGvUR+Ibx4EQn2QmozkbR6QSAW+dYXLM=; b=Zm9VVCdjJroi5m/Rsm2x0sX++gDgphLbHTqXHE07cNAqhGuQJejU6vbRK289jS0Gw5 MDY3yltL9DuMTn5AeU/+iYp5av57v7i3kVMiCY6ejJZFtWif7yqBlchze92DQkuSPwkr tAJsPZifpUrBSNm5LxSLQOeO6T6FU1UYE3BFdLUPUpyj15x5GwfiQOPJWg3mLP6a+Xfj OMSFMQpj29NzZ84/co2bVcECL2PMOo6j8yfoJg+SxyOcXY7XyModrL4jIEegLCbGOLws W4aBldWcivjhBSPXgCbzvDWSI8XvpXVUXkTXL4+09uCLfyXyfpBtM6UVUChewAl7Vvv4 gbOw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUISYyvq+SCChyX937oYwe2X7owFs6yDWjFREfXN6DYbuonpwSM hHUHnmKJ+q2Ujj2CBavtjxl13g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxe5SwJVhPUTSQTsEzA0IpvKFD5QTPFOxGNLcPJAHj5DVSb5/WICaW9jbI6RmUpHtZ9sCWyig== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8f81:: with SMTP id z1mr41681710plo.265.1552409969614; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:1:75a:3f6e:21d:9374]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 11sm11887958pfh.131.2019.03.12.09.59.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:59:28 -0700 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: Harish Bandi Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, johan.hedberg@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, hemantg@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bgodavar@codeaurora.org, anubhavg@codeaurora.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: Add device tree bindings for QTI chip wcn3998 Message-ID: <20190312165928.GD200579@google.com> References: <1552393379-26330-1-git-send-email-c-hbandi@codeaurora.org> <1552393379-26330-3-git-send-email-c-hbandi@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1552393379-26330-3-git-send-email-c-hbandi@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org +DT folks Please add them in future versions (script/scripts/get_maintainer.pl should have listed them) On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 05:52:59PM +0530, Harish Bandi wrote: > This patch enables regulators for the Qualcomm Bluetooth wcn3998 > controller. No, it doesn't. The next version should probably say something like "Add compatible string for the Qualcomm WCN3998 Bluetooth controller. Is there any particular reason why QCA drivers folks use 'wcn' instead of 'WCN'? The QCA documentations calls it WCN399x, so I'd suggest to consistently use the uppercase name in comments and documentation (and log messages?). > Signed-off-by: Harish Bandi > --- > changes in v3: > - updated to latest code base. This comment is useless, please describe what changed wrt the previous version. > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt > index 824c0e2..1221535 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt > @@ -53,3 +53,18 @@ serial@898000 { > max-speed = <3200000>; > }; > }; > + > +&blsp1_uart3 { > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&blsp1_uart3_default>; > + status = "okay"; > + > + bluetooth: wcn3998-bt { > + compatible = "qcom,wcn3998-bt"; > + vddio-supply = <&vreg_l6_1p8>; > + vddxo-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>; > + vddrf-supply = <&vreg_s5_1p35>; > + vddch0-supply = <&vdd_ch0_3p3>; > + max-speed = <3200000>; > + }; > +}; > \ No newline at end of file I think the example isn't really needed since it's essentially the same as the one for 'qcom,wcn3990-bt'. But the important part is missing: add the new compatible string under ´Required properties´. You also want to update the documentation that mentiones 'qcom,wcn3990-bt' to 'qcom,wcn399x-bt' (assuming for now that other possible WCN399x chips would be similar). You mentioned in an earlier version of the series that there are multiple WCN3998 variants with different requirements for voltage/current. This seems to suggests that multiple compatible strings are needed to distinguish between them. Thanks Matthias