Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191126191452.23603-1-alainm@chromium.org> <7223C834-7E4C-4521-9C1E-CA7C2F26EC63@holtmann.org>
 <CABBYNZLg5+QM_+ZDBp3mfBnLq=3w05gTxb8=oRFLiYdTyDNsYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABBYNZLg5+QM_+ZDBp3mfBnLq=3w05gTxb8=oRFLiYdTyDNsYA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Alain Michaud <alainmichaud@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:44:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CALWDO_V5SU59JSt5yTz+iswFdAFgG4nYxgyF7uTmkE0bVVvXQw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Blocked key mgmt Api definition
To:     Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        Alain Michaud <alainm@chromium.org>,
        Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Luiz,

Yes, look for more patches from me on this next week.

Thanks,
Alain


On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:54 AM Luiz Augusto von Dentz
<luiz.dentz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcel, Alain,
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 8:02 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wro=
te:
> >
> > Hi Alain,
> >
> > > ---
> > > doc/mgmt-api.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > patch has been applied.
> >
> > > +
> > > +     This command can be used at anypoint to add to the list of bloc=
ked keys.  Any connections that
> > > +     are attempting to use the keys will be terminated. If a device =
tries to distribute the keys during
> > > +     pairing, pairing will fail.
> > > +
> >
> > However, I ended up rewording this part since it doesn=E2=80=99t sounde=
d right to me. We can adjust this once we have the implementation to match =
against, but for now I kept it simple. Oh, and we need to stay within the r=
ule that it has to readable in 80 character wide terminal. So no long lines=
.
>
> Will there be a follow up change to add support for this in the
> daemon, I suspect we will need to have it given as a file or will the
> blacklist be just hardcoded?
>
> --
> Luiz Augusto von Dentz