Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] dt-bindings: net: bluetooth: Add device tree
 bindings for QCA6390
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
In-Reply-To: <0101016ef8b923bc-5760b40c-1968-4992-9186-8e3965207236-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Dec 2019 11:33:06 +0100
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, bgodavar@codeaurora.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Message-Id: <24B540FF-C627-4DF9-9077-247A4A6A3605@holtmann.org>
References: <0101016ef8b923bc-5760b40c-1968-4992-9186-8e3965207236-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
To:     Rocky Liao <rjliao@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rocky,

> Add compatible string for the Qualcomm QCA6390 Bluetooth controller
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
> index 68b67d9db63a..87b7f9d22414 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qualcomm-bluetooth.txt
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ device the slave device is attached to.
> Required properties:
>  - compatible: should contain one of the following:
>    * "qcom,qca6174-bt"
> +   * "qcom,qca6390-bt"
>    * "qcom,wcn3990-bt"
>    * "qcom,wcn3998-bt"

now I am confused. Is this a DT platform or ACPI or both?

Regards

Marcel