Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Jamie Mccrae <Jamie.Mccrae@lairdconnect.com>
To:     Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
        "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 2/2] Bluetooth: Add BT_PHYS socket option
Thread-Topic: [RFC 2/2] Bluetooth: Add BT_PHYS socket option
Thread-Index: AQHVwZGPa63zSU1M/UaBS0dpx7czZ6fYiSdg
Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:22:29 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR14MB1385EC175428FE2F702258FEE6230@DM5PR14MB1385.namprd14.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20200102172447.18574-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
 <20200102172447.18574-2-luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200102172447.18574-2-luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: lairdconnect.com does not
 designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f9f778e7-369b-412a-761d-08d7901db0ed
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Jan 2020 07:22:29.2128
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a67ad7fe-2b14-4d12-b58f-bb509b58f338
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: udAKqpV57oYRbjrteX2y21JTCkeJi0ox6Jg9K5mYk5ALW64ZXEe77Q01MOKKNweVrbqV/elP474f8eJB4dr+8GT/tXgbk+GM8O8xNk4Oz9A=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR14MB1468
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-bluetooth.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org

> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h b/include/net/bluetooth/bl=
uetooth.h
> index e42bb8e03c09..69c0e7eb26d9 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h
> @@ -121,6 +121,23 @@ struct bt_voice {
>
>  #define BT_SNDMTU              12
>  #define BT_RCVMTU              13
> +#define BT_PHYS                        14
> +
> +#define BT_PHY_BR_1M_1SLOT     0x00000001
> +#define BT_PHY_BR_1M_3SLOT     0x00000002
> +#define BT_PHY_BR_1M_5SLOT     0x00000004
> +#define BT_PHY_EDR_2M_1SLOT    0x00000008
> +#define BT_PHY_EDR_2M_3SLOT    0x00000010
> +#define BT_PHY_EDR_2M_5SLOT    0x00000020
> +#define BT_PHY_EDR_3M_1SLOT    0x00000040
> +#define BT_PHY_EDR_3M_3SLOT    0x00000080
> +#define BT_PHY_EDR_3M_5SLOT    0x00000100
> +#define BT_PHY_LE_1M_TX                0x00000200
> +#define BT_PHY_LE_1M_RX                0x00000400
> +#define BT_PHY_LE_2M_TX                0x00000800
> +#define BT_PHY_LE_2M_RX                0x00001000
> +#define BT_PHY_LE_CODED_TX     0x00002000
> +#define BT_PHY_LE_CODED_RX     0x00004000

My query about this is there is an option for LE Coded, but LE coded can ha=
ve a data rate of 125Kbps or 500Kbps, is there no need to differentiate bet=
ween the two rates in applications?
THIS MESSAGE, ANY ATTACHMENT(S), AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN MAY B=
E PROPRIETARY TO LAIRD CONNECTIVITY, INC. AND/OR ANOTHER PARTY, AND MAY FUR=
THER BE INTENDED TO BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIP=
IENT, PLEASE DELETE THE EMAIL AND ANY ATTACHMENTS, AND IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY T=
HE SENDER BY RETURN EMAIL. THIS MESSAGE AND ITS CONTENTS ARE THE PROPERTY O=
F LAIRD CONNECTIVITY, INC. AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR USED WITHOUT THE EX=
PRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF LAIRD CONNECTIVITY, INC.