Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp4947753ybb; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:11:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvhXyK5ewnoozdZjF1CoIenGZydbZsKWZ6EdBFUttfozPnyofEA8gORM5gTHjr04r7/L4UF X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6446:: with SMTP id m6mr21274369otl.122.1585062712974; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585062712; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qKS4KKbLhig4mSJFOOoM2euqrgm979xpa70nb9CidPiJpiZEubLWK0NY6M0nESIreo e5rA24k/qZWgShedMTaGg4rcEnnzltHf2VhfF35KWhyOId34vhrJxag3jz0Lo4JyyNch kwYu43fQCdCjROkDgf04UbBSudwGKzp8gVJ4Y2QLkDe8EWm9fjiC6a1okdwNk0XKP0gk BYLjfS1he8/r2sqcs5S2E4DUACjIlHyM+8uqjxC+eRnCcAgt9pgzZgG2GOs2COhyj94k bXBvUQ64PbaW2EjoGHOUGW8M6oRWNn4+nH1GPiVHQWfRXU1c5LUQpjlHwuAtGLXJVcTI iB1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=kyFduZ6VwjzQIiJQ/lBuEzWDfMDYvttrQIwiQL9qENU=; b=X3Vupbovc/cm67egiEiLeYVQDBOJm9iq0grTNywBVff5HtQpc06/zIx7KasL/hlpUr 9XXfN4j8UFFsqGPinw5kZ7dkHCywnMvyi2jSSbyW2aGGHWHCD4cQ0AK4SMk1C7210QXI 26HrY6Sfmg4J6V6BXdbMV3NbuU0s4ayDL+Z1uxczwgo/dHHH1AzsDQu9uFSUeP9926Oc qBLpWmrPd1QrW3iGMu04EH9e20dZNBtmOGWwXAUxUgP8D9BfV5qG7kM0aCvo9rPqYFgj oG66i5zSv+pdaoDbiUAcpcSARM+kBBZUrxmXatRadFUZOSXwZRpwVJNyf4dPQzudbWws kBLA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lV8x446t; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n26si9549588otr.78.2020.03.24.08.11.19; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lV8x446t; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727881AbgCXPLH (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:11:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:39976 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727650AbgCXPLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:11:07 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 19so18938536ljj.7 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:11:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kyFduZ6VwjzQIiJQ/lBuEzWDfMDYvttrQIwiQL9qENU=; b=lV8x446tzSYygFYppGaw9+2BQMof1D1ksnvF9IK7P+8mx5vNtsOTdVM0v5TOcGdG8c Uq/7Q2y3gt/SJglq0t0+tp+EzPFRMtEiihvrZGEacloF6tkUjAPyuAdHfPwlfchVODTM EAg9baoKJ4IAG1KVVOb8L5IYhjdwl4ziCTLTBv+d2XvrOK76ub1eNBh24xv4N4j+nHj+ sr8DHzmtdyy5bC97jyU+bv5+Va3RnF4ILk0I5qJ38KnPf9wKY+9VpiXPVm3kzoi1/dd5 NkptJKCJSWlkoNTqNamItZDIi9AC3tW3wh+vpWkBuMGne7WWacZxIDntgraqioVPopWc dmkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kyFduZ6VwjzQIiJQ/lBuEzWDfMDYvttrQIwiQL9qENU=; b=SB1BnOTNzXBw+lfxMmBzLqG7R7Wbez1gBFj7UacEva1PPfBQt5dNzT13c1pPi9KQCL oER3mp/SNw4P9Gy8dH2/C+rraRq7+RKACPj4HNqGphxzcfKdvkn+LnIVO1cyyOyx5+2U nKelHpmp7axZck0FfADYlfJrr44poDwfEi3AKn1pzyCiFiVm7OKthA+mwze00vR/JEcD wCGHhW4FJIfJ7dnXziUcrSWaQmFpN42NDdJarJZx7JUkyL84GfMbO1yU7Y2k+L4X+VIT 5QV5mJGw4GxDnR1q3YMt0ZiQ3fHwOhMrKFn15RrSlrFgq2TJUSjVBwFrX9XSYR0IB+9c dfOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2t2dPSP4blEz7XAm+vB7jeyVqvscYMA5cDBQRMuCJAyZxo23wI qTkmLFCeZmOkTeFvLgrq7wMwq6JJTqzVdFNoFphhIjGwNEw= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a90:: with SMTP id p16mr18017042lji.277.1585062664389; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:11:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200323072824.254495-1-mcchou@chromium.org> <20200323002820.v1.1.I0e975833a6789e8acc74be7756cd54afde6ba98c@changeid> <04021BE3-63F7-4B19-9F0E-145785594E8C@holtmann.org> <421d27670f2736c88e8c0693e3ff7c0dcfceb40b.camel@perches.com> <57C56801-7F3B-478A-83E9-1D2376C60666@holtmann.org> <03547be94c4944ca672c7aef2dd38b0fb1eedc84.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: <03547be94c4944ca672c7aef2dd38b0fb1eedc84.camel@perches.com> From: Alain Michaud Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:10:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Bluetooth: btusb: Indicate Microsoft vendor extension for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260 To: Joe Perches Cc: Marcel Holtmann , Miao-chen Chou , Bluetooth Kernel Mailing List , Luiz Augusto von Dentz , Alain Michaud , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Johan Hedberg , LKML , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 4:11 PM Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > Hello Marcel. > > > > > > This adds a bit mask of driver_info for Microsoft vendor extension and > > > > > indicates the support for Intel 9460/9560 and 9160/9260. See > > > > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/bluetooth/ > > > > > microsoft-defined-bluetooth-hci-commands-and-events for more information > > > > > about the extension. This was verified with Intel ThunderPeak BT controller > > > > > where msft_vnd_ext_opcode is 0xFC1E. > > > [] > > > > > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h > > > [] > > > > > @@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ struct hci_dev { > > > > > __u8 ssp_debug_mode; > > > > > __u8 hw_error_code; > > > > > __u32 clock; > > > > > + __u16 msft_vnd_ext_opcode; > > > > > + __u64 msft_vnd_ext_features; > > > > > + __u8 msft_vnd_ext_evt_prefix_len; > > > > > + void *msft_vnd_ext_evt_prefix; > > > > > > msft is just another vendor. > > > > > > If there are to be vendor extensions, this should > > > likely use a blank line above and below and not > > > be prefixed with msft_ > > > > there are other vendors, but all of them are different. So this needs to be prefixed with msft_ actually. But I agree that having empty lines above and below makes it more readable. > > So struct hci_dev should become a clutter > of random vendor extensions? > > Perhaps there should instead be something like > an array of char at the end of the struct and > various vendor specific extensions could be > overlaid on that array or just add a void * > to whatever info that vendors require. I don't particularly like trailing buffers, but I agree we could possibly organize this a little better by with a struct. something like: struct msft_vnd_ext { bool supported; // <-- Clearly calls out if the extension is supported. __u16 msft_vnd_ext_opcode; // <-- Note that this also needs to be provided by the driver. I don't recommend we have this read from the hardware since we just cause an extra redirection that isn't necessary. Ideally, this should come from the usb_table const. __u64 msft_vnd_ext_features; __u8 msft_vnd_ext_evt_prefix_len; void *msft_vnd_ext_evt_prefix; }; And then simply add the struct msft_vnd_ext (and any others) to hci_dev. > > >