Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 3 Apr 2020 19:54:02 +0200
From:   =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82?= Lowas-Rzechonek 
        <michal.lowas-rzechonek@silvair.com>
To:     linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     brian.gix@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH BlueZ RESEND] mesh: Remove redundant code from mesh/crypto
Message-ID: <20200403175402.xto4ub6w6uqqyfz4@kynes>
Mail-Followup-To: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, brian.gix@intel.com
References: <20200326211705.18678-1-michal.lowas-rzechonek@silvair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20200326211705.18678-1-michal.lowas-rzechonek@silvair.com>
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Brian,

On 03/26, Michał Lowas-Rzechonek wrote:
> - Remove application_encrypt/application_decrypt
> - Make mesh_crypto_privacy_counter private, add mesh_crypto_pecb
> - Make *_nonce functions private and align their implementation to be
>   more consistent
> - Refactor network_encrypt/network_decrypt to use *_nonce functions and
>   rename them to packet_encrypt/packet_decrypt
> - Refactor packet_encode/packet_decode

Ping...

This version of the patch passes unit tests. I'd really like to get this
applied. Or at least tell me straight in the face that I should bugger
off ;)

regards
-- 
Michał Lowas-Rzechonek <michal.lowas-rzechonek@silvair.com>
Silvair http://silvair.com
Jasnogórska 44, 31-358 Krakow, POLAND