Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200407205611.1002903-1-marcel@holtmann.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200407205611.1002903-1-marcel@holtmann.org>
From:   Sathish Narasimman <nsathish41@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 18:41:37 +0530
Message-ID: <CAOVXEJJeriSp=5ywt4ZxND7mYY=yepShCC5U-8s8=_rWQup3wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Update resolving list when updating whitelist
To:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc:     Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marcel

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 2:26 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> wrote:
>
> When the whitelist is updated, then also update the entries of the
> resolving list for devices where IRKs are available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> index efec2a0bb824..45fbda5323af 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> @@ -695,6 +695,21 @@ static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
>         bt_dev_dbg(req->hdev, "Remove %pMR (0x%x) from whitelist", &cp.bdaddr,
>                    cp.bdaddr_type);
>         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +
> +       if (use_ll_privacy(req->hdev)) {
> +               struct smp_irk *irk;
> +
> +               irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(req->hdev, bdaddr, bdaddr_type);
> +               if (irk) {
> +                       struct hci_cp_le_del_from_resolv_list cp;
> +
> +                       cp.bdaddr_type = bdaddr_type;
> +                       bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, bdaddr);
> +
> +                       hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_RESOLV_LIST,
> +                                   sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +               }
> +       }
>  }
>
>  /* Adds connection to white list if needed. On error, returns -1. */
> @@ -715,7 +730,7 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
>                 return -1;
>
>         /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -       if (!allow_rpa &&
> +       if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
>             hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type)) {
>                 return -1;
>         }
> @@ -732,6 +747,24 @@ static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
>                    cp.bdaddr_type);
>         hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
>
> +       if (use_ll_privacy(hdev)) {
> +               struct smp_irk *irk;
> +
> +               irk = hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
> +                                          params->addr_type);
> +               if (irk) {
> +                       struct hci_cp_le_add_to_resolv_list cp;
> +
> +                       cp.bdaddr_type = params->addr_type;
> +                       bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &params->addr);
> +                       memcpy(cp.peer_irk, irk->val, 16);
> +                       memset(cp.local_irk, 0, 16);
Shall we memcpy hdev->irk as local_irk here.
if  privacy (HCI_PRIVACY)  is enabled. also if controller supports
LL_PRIVACY so that stack can utilize it.
else continue with HCI_PRIVACY.
Is there any drawback with this approach. please guide
> +
> +                       hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_RESOLV_LIST,
> +                                   sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +               }
> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -772,7 +805,7 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
>                 }
>
>                 /* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -               if (!allow_rpa &&
> +               if (!allow_rpa && !use_ll_privacy(hdev) &&
>                     hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
>                         return 0x00;
>                 }
> --
> 2.25.2
>

Regards
Sathish N