Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <ebbb9f334f6f0cecdb46ddce63483df165ea12ec.camel@hadess.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: L2CAP: Try harder to accept device not
 knowing options
From:   Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
To:     Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc:     "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        Florian Dollinger <dollinger.florian@gmx.de>
Date:   Wed, 06 Jan 2021 10:25:55 +0100
In-Reply-To: <6e6d72ff9aa14a65d6d0df5bd68a6ad6887f31c2.camel@hadess.net>
References: <20201208172912.4352-1-hadess@hadess.net>
         <CABBYNZJNTDek+kKS5wtrr67Xx8DmFGvcV13cLSxULgJRa5N+3g@mail.gmail.com>
         <6e6d72ff9aa14a65d6d0df5bd68a6ad6887f31c2.camel@hadess.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.2 (3.38.2-1.fc33) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 2020-12-16 at 16:49 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> <snip>
> The tests fail for me in the same on a kernel with and without
> the
> patch:
> - Expected that the IUT transmits an L2CAP_ConfigRsp includes the
> unsupported option that Lower Tester sent.
> Final Verdict:FAIL
> L2CAP/COS/CFD/BV-14-C finished
> 
> Is this expected? I was using an 5.10-rc7 kernel with and without the
> patch I sent. I can send you the full results off-list if you want
> them.

Any news on that? Is the error expected, should I test with a newer
version of the kernel? I'd really like to finally land this...