Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210421202408.itigrlc2cltwu4sv@gonzo.waveform.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20210421202408.itigrlc2cltwu4sv@gonzo.waveform.org.uk>
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 21 Apr 2021 21:10:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CABBYNZJN4t2F37rrmb2TfdeyYdpv8q4K02SXXNEgY_Y9tONWKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Archived raspi compatibility patchset
To:     Dave Jones <dave.jones@canonical.com>
Cc:     Bluetooth Kernel Mailing List <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Dave,

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:23 PM Dave Jones <dave.jones@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just noticed the patchset [1] I submitted a while back for
> compatibility with the bt modules on Raspberry Pi boards was archived,
> and was wondering if I'd missed some procedure to follow in getting it
> reviewed? My apologies if I've jumped the gun on something!
>
> I'm happy to either rebase and re-submit (though looking at the current
> master I think they'd probably apply cleanly still), or unarchive them
> on patchwork (if that's an acceptable alternative)?
>
> [1]:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/cover/20201218190609.107898-1-dave.jones@canonical.com/

My bad I probably forgot to reply, hciattach was deprecated in favor
of btattach so please port the changes to btattach whenever possible
and re-submit them.

> Thanks,
>
> Dave Jones.


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz