Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210727195057.Bluez.v1.1.I20397b8350f98567b8d52b895442c768250a6ab3@changeid>
 <CABBYNZJkvaeuMJLKXueoLKq7hXBskxYSPbGujHEj72=qfF4+DQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPHZWUeCGeu+gpYkfhMUKxXGMPZY0ZeKTpHDO-QcCvhwarR0dw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPHZWUc0wHLVTSFGzEYWjE-3f4JyKyXtYem+wBm11K3kxn3pQw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPHZWUc0wHLVTSFGzEYWjE-3f4JyKyXtYem+wBm11K3kxn3pQw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:53:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CABBYNZKme8gTytB6=CBqv636t5hFy637DhaqipCRDRCei+t_Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bluez PATCH v1] gatt-db: fix service in range check
To:     Yun-hao Chung <howardchung@google.com>
Cc:     "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        Yun-Hao Chung <howardchung@chromium.org>,
        Archie Pusaka <apusaka@chromium.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Howard,

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 7:51 PM Yun-hao Chung <howardchung@google.com> wrote:
>
> > > >                 if (svc_start < foreach_data->start ||
> > > >                                       svc_start > foreach_data->end)
> > > >                         return;
> After discussing with Archie, if we understand you correctly, we think
> this early return can be removed.
> Let's say the searched range is 5-9 and the service is 1-14, then we
> should consider the service is in range.
> If we want to keep the early return, svc_start > foreach_data->end is
> already checked a few lines before, so this check is redundant.

Yep, that seems we have already had the same check so Im fine dropping
the check.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz