Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B415C433FE for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:56:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241639AbhLUS4z (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:56:55 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53028 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S241613AbhLUS4z (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:56:55 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09BDCC061574 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id g17so41413102ybe.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:56:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GTp+gKI09ItTX62WF9a29scRtdfiwZ7+1XQOds887iI=; b=ZKL1lvByZvrsd6a2Wi7oq03KrJTOs9EH5urveL3EYTtBpXfuOAo/M4ODJ2ifV5dpp3 ZJdl9vaQ3xGUBckq/JBM+z4ZeD3pnHSeHIO/ijKC7/31Cw+IHHQh6qsUPOxuPBMYfpo3 4VqNcfzj5MtScjunsu4ri2zgLe7tygJVpzuASH1P6DiGD82BRv0QwhaUBCMEmHIqyJWF 1mPbK238RJlUy8m1ncajC1SYUv5t7JwlSKJ3mXl6PImgZQ4Ga1Ane8Ja5ItdJkNZwWtw M9kN5KgTzuXgp2TKB2UqIgHt+ZVBJRmqdlInXMFpl9v/xxub56GQ+0lf6nA8i3q8bXMS TBMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GTp+gKI09ItTX62WF9a29scRtdfiwZ7+1XQOds887iI=; b=roVW7Clck4mmuwv8dyblzXMaPqodiBTp99BUnbJGWSn1iN7G0ml6xvetCORupjk/nD ANFW4VlG+4EDWpH2crR/kZRzthA+PUcgFNNH9zd73jluAAvYeOf/0HMa0fjIvjO2sr4V KqNm1hQFQvnnVBE9QYEbjdoF95hzCHa5Wot4lWvA14i7CofiKN6Gl+FV0rNaQOZU6CR0 pfgx9SZfuLIGpdm2Z3s2J+KyumtrkPefZwdwwG+MsOH8fiSotiYpLeoCZ1hQQ17C0I4/ 3+7DQYPl4i33JPQJMX1EaeD899hT0vIAdo/SeT6NJ/wCX28X2A2+us0KoLVxNoDhozN8 eVxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kgWlQuOlDU/A3dkrpvUxXoTwFCkmbMzVHiFwd+HGbYaXwc2ou NR99ZwODWffVqJ53esNcJMcVDibaoCTrTIfOL+g6O6rh X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7SChK/EXOBclxnlXbMwcDiIiE1gzA68zA01HfSGrjW/zWggtGxJfti9FBLNOcowpJpJcoTkKbf0SRuCT/06g= X-Received: by 2002:a25:9bc9:: with SMTP id w9mr6309739ybo.398.1640113014164; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:56:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211221034246.2416-1-kiran.k@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20211221034246.2416-1-kiran.k@intel.com> From: Luiz Augusto von Dentz Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 10:56:43 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: btintel: Fix MSFT extension support for Intel controllers To: Kiran K Cc: "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" , "Srivatsa, Ravishankar" , Chethan T N , "An, Tedd" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Hi Kiran, On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:49 AM Kiran K wrote: > > From: Chethan T N > > For ThP2/JfP2/HrP2 and CcP2 Intel controllers, MSFT extension > opcode was not set in operational mode. You should probably add a Fixes for the original patch that introduces this problem. > Signed-off-by: Chethan T N > Signed-off-by: Kiran K > --- > drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c > index e1f96df847b8..0dd389746439 100644 > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btintel.c > @@ -2549,10 +2549,6 @@ static int btintel_setup_combined(struct hci_dev *hdev) > if (INTEL_HW_VARIANT(ver_tlv.cnvi_bt) == 0x18) > set_bit(HCI_QUIRK_VALID_LE_STATES, &hdev->quirks); > > - /* Setup MSFT Extension support */ > - btintel_set_msft_opcode(hdev, > - INTEL_HW_VARIANT(ver_tlv.cnvi_bt)); > - > err = btintel_bootloader_setup_tlv(hdev, &ver_tlv); > break; > default: > @@ -2560,6 +2556,8 @@ static int btintel_setup_combined(struct hci_dev *hdev) > INTEL_HW_VARIANT(ver_tlv.cnvi_bt)); > return -EINVAL; > } Please add a comment stating why it is correct to do it here instead. > + /* Setup MSFT Extension support */ > + btintel_set_msft_opcode(hdev, INTEL_HW_VARIANT(ver_tlv.cnvi_bt)); > > exit_error: > kfree_skb(skb); > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Luiz Augusto von Dentz