Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220805232834.4024091-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
 <20220805174724.12fcb86a@kernel.org> <CABBYNZLPkVHJRtGkfV8eugAgLoSxK+jf_-UwhSoL2n=9J9TFcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220808143011.7136f07a@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220808143011.7136f07a@kernel.org>
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:36:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABBYNZKmuUpmUChz+tixFCOE_pUeaJq0Sbqkvjy54zd9H=GB4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth 2022-08-05
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Jakub,

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 2:30 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 12:38:25 -0700 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > Did you end up switching to the no-rebase/pull-back model or are you
> > > still rebasing?
> >
> > Still rebasing, I thought that didn't make any difference as long as
> > the patches apply.
>
> Long term the non-rebasing model is probably better since it'd be great
> for the bluetooth tree to be included in linux-next.

You mean that bluetooth-next would be pulled directly into linux-next
rather than net-next?

> Since you haven't started using that model, tho, would you mind
> repairing the Fixes tags in this PR? :)

Let me fix them.

-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz