Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:50:34 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth 2022-08-05
Message-ID: <20220808145034.63fc918e@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABBYNZKmuUpmUChz+tixFCOE_pUeaJq0Sbqkvjy54zd9H=GB4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220805232834.4024091-1-luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
        <20220805174724.12fcb86a@kernel.org>
        <CABBYNZLPkVHJRtGkfV8eugAgLoSxK+jf_-UwhSoL2n=9J9TFcw@mail.gmail.com>
        <20220808143011.7136f07a@kernel.org>
        <CABBYNZKmuUpmUChz+tixFCOE_pUeaJq0Sbqkvjy54zd9H=GB4A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 14:36:16 -0700 Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > > Still rebasing, I thought that didn't make any difference as long as
> > > the patches apply.  
> >
> > Long term the non-rebasing model is probably better since it'd be great
> > for the bluetooth tree to be included in linux-next.  
> 
> You mean that bluetooth-next would be pulled directly into linux-next
> rather than net-next?

No, no. linux-next is just an integration tree, it doesn't take PRs.
Some more info:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/howto.html#linux-next-integration-testing-tree

It's mostly for checking for conflicts and automated testing.
All the compilation bots run on it.

> > Since you haven't started using that model, tho, would you mind
> > repairing the Fixes tags in this PR? :)  
> 
> Let me fix them.

Thanks!