Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <a7485b76-b4aa-a6d6-b509-c6f370380926@denx.de>
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2022 23:38:14 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.4.0
Subject: Re: [1/2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW4373A0 DT
 binding
Content-Language: en-US
To:     linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>
References: <20221031204804.195267-1-marex@denx.de>
 <6360471e.4a0a0220.4aceb.91b7@mx.google.com>
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
In-Reply-To: <6360471e.4a0a0220.4aceb.91b7@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/31/22 23:07, bluez.test.bot@gmail.com wrote:
> This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!
> 
> Dear submitter,
> 
> Thank you for submitting the patches to the linux bluetooth mailing list.
> This is a CI test results with your patch series:
> PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/bluetooth/list/?series=690631
> 
> ---Test result---
> 
> Test Summary:
> CheckPatch                    PASS      2.99 seconds
> GitLint                       PASS      1.48 seconds
> SubjectPrefix                 FAIL      0.58 seconds

Should the DT bindings really have Bluetooth: prefix/tag too ?
git log on prior art indicates they shouldn't .