Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To:     Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch V2 07/17] timers: Update kernel-doc for various functions
In-Reply-To: <c3e79ef-a9c4-bee8-cf4-1bea9ad85920@linutronix.de>
References: <20221122171312.191765396@linutronix.de>
 <20221122173648.501792201@linutronix.de>
 <c3e79ef-a9c4-bee8-cf4-1bea9ad85920@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:09:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87bkoxegxe.ffs@tglx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 23 2022 at 11:23, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
>>  /**
>> - * add_timer_on - start a timer on a particular CPU
>> - * @timer: the timer to be added
>> - * @cpu: the CPU to start it on
>> + * add_timer_on - Start a timer on a particular CPU
>> + * @timer:	The timer to be started
>> + * @cpu:	The CPU to start it on
>>   *
>> - * This is not very scalable on SMP. Double adds are not possible.
>> + * This can only operate on an inactive timer. Attempts to invoke this on
>> + * an active timer are rejected with a warning.
>
> This is also true for add_timer(). Is it possible to add this to
> add_timer() function description and just referencing to add_timer()
> function description in add_timer_on()? They behave the same, only
> difference is the CPU where the timer is enqueued.

Indeed.