Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <af383bea-f30d-f0fe-500f-c50904505293@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:54:24 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/2] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for Qualcomm
 Bluetooth SoC QCA2066
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
CC:     <marcel@holtmann.org>, <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
        <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <quic_bgodavar@quicinc.com>, <quic_hemantg@quicinc.com>
References: <20230727044011.965205-1-quic_tjiang@quicinc.com>
 <ZMIb6RWvhvtteRXE@hovoldconsulting.com>
From:   Tim Jiang <quic_tjiang@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZMIb6RWvhvtteRXE@hovoldconsulting.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 7/27/23 15:25, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 12:40:09PM +0800, Tim Jiang wrote:
>> This series adds support for qualcomm bluetooth soc qca2066
>>
>> Changes in v13
>>   - change the subject name for patch 1/2
>>   - solve review comments for patch 2/2
> Again, this is not specific enough and essentially only explains why you
> changed something, but doesn't say what you changed.
>
> You also again ignored some of my review comments without even
> explaining why.

[Tim] sorry for that , seems the email I explain why we do not need to 
sort the btsoc name does not be sent out for network issue.

as qc define btsoc name does not be sorted  alphabetilly, and we add new 
chip name followed by old one , I think we only under this rule is OK,  
do you agree?  thank you very much.

>
> Seriously, you Qualcomm engineers really need to get your act together
> and stop wasting other people's time.
>
> Johan