Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth+bounces-323-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Message-ID: <115e819b-0271-403c-b034-ef3aebbb85cd@moonlit-rail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 03:19:04 -0500
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Regression: Inoperative bluetooth, Intel chipset, mainline kernel
 6.6.2+
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
 Linux Bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
 Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
 Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>, Zach <zacheryvig@outlook.com>
References: <ee109942-ef8e-45b9-8cb9-a98a787fe094@moonlit-rail.com>
 <ZWl82n695TIC7nUO@archie.me>
Content-Language: en-US, en-GB
From: "Kris Karas (Bug Reporting)" <bugs-a21@moonlit-rail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZWl82n695TIC7nUO@archie.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Kris Karas (Bug Reporting) wrote:
>> I have a regression going from mainline kernel 6.1.62 to 6.1.63, and also
>> from kernel 6.6.1 to 6.6.2; I can bisect if patch authors can't locate the
>> relevant commit.  In the most recent kernels mentioned, bluetooth won't
>> function.
> 
> Then please do bisection; without it, nobody will look into this properly.

As only a few people are reporting this, it must be pretty 
hardware-specific (or perhaps Kconfig/firmware specific).  I'll do a 
bisect.  A bit too late here in Boston (03:00), and kiddo's birthday 
"later today", so will probably get to this on the weekend.

> You may also want to check current mainline (v6.7-rc3) to see if this
> regression have already been fixed.

Just tried 6.7.0-rc3, and it is also affected.

I hadn't git-pulled my linux-stable since May, so that gave me a good 
chance to test the very latest.  :-)  And conveniently I'm now set for 
the bisect.

Kris