Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-bluetooth+bounces-3839-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Message-ID: <04211e34-5a6b-45ec-91f7-60aaf0b6e2c5@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:07:30 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix two regression issues for QCA controllers
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>, <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>,
        <marcel@holtmann.org>
CC: <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>, <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
        <wt@penguintechs.org>
References: <1713449192-25926-1-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
 <1713564212-21725-1-git-send-email-quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
 <3ab33f9c-206a-4c77-816a-471769591b6c@linaro.org>
 <8e2b0731-fc0e-446e-af83-478e6e86a7ad@linaro.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: quic_zijuhu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8e2b0731-fc0e-446e-af83-478e6e86a7ad@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/22/2024 3:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/04/2024 13:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/04/2024 00:03, Zijun Hu wrote:
>>> This patch series are to fix below 2 regression issues for QCA controllers
>>> 1) BT can't be enabled once BT was ever enabled for QCA_QCA6390
>>> 2) BT can't be enabled after disable then warm reboot for QCA_QCA6390
>>>
>>> the links for these issues are shown below:
>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218726
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/ea20
>>
>>
>> Provide changelog, either in cover letter or in individual patches under
>> ---.
>>
>> Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads (unrelated
>> or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and might
>> interfere with applying entire sets.
>>
> 
sorry, not notice this.
in order to send vN patch sets.
do i need to --in-reply-to  v(N-1) cover letter or v0 cover-letter ?

> How did you implement these two feedbacks?
> 
actually. i don't understand that two feedbacks so ask above questions.
> v4 and v5 are still bad.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>